My web design authors dream team

The other day I was looking at a web design book with ten authors, one for each chapter. All the authors were men.

I write books about web design. I know some other women who do, too. I thought, it would be fun to put together a team of women to write a book about web design. And, of course, as soon as I had that thought, I started ticking off names of women who ought to participate and write a chapter.

Well, okay, it’s my idea, so I get to be one of the authors, don’t I? I could do a chapter on what to include in a web design curriculum or best practices in educating web designers. Or something.

I’ve been looking at the built-in CSS layouts packed with Adobe Dreamweaver CS3 for a classroom seminar I have to give. And I know who did all those layouts. It’s Stephanie Sullivan. She writes for Adobe about Dreamweaver. She co-authored a book about Dreamweaver, she’s a contributor at Community MX. Her personal business site is W3conversions.com. How about a chapter on Dreamweaver from Steph?

Another writer for Community MX is Zoe Gillenwater. Zoe is an absolute genius about CSS. I know this is true because I’ve watched her work on the CSS Discuss list. I also know first hand how brilliant she is because she was the technical editor of my latest book. Her personal site is Pixel Surge. Her chapter? Something about CSS, or maybe Dreamweaver.

Then I thought of Liz Castro. I own every edition of Elizabeth Castro’s best selling book HTML book. The latest is the 6th edition. The book? HTML, XHTML, and CSS, Sixth Edition (Visual Quickstart Guide). She’s written about 10 other books about everything from XML to Blogger. Her personal site is Cookwood Press. She should definitely write a chapter.

The book needs a chapter about blogs, right? How about the co-author of WordPress 2 (Visual Quickstart Guide), Miraz Jordan? She writes the Mactips blog. She’s also published articles in a whole lot of places.

A web design does not live by HTML and CSS alone. No, it needs JavaScript. It needs PHP. It needs AJAX. It needs Dori Smith. Poor Amazon can’t seem to distinguish Dori from Doris, but look for a title about JavaScript, Java, Mac OS, or AJAX, and you’ll know you found Dori. She can add a chapter about programming to my dream team book.

We need something about design strategy in there. Usability, maybe. How about Adaptive Path’s Sarah B. Nelson? Her blog is called Cartographies of Imagination, and since it’s about collaboration, she ought to be a natural contributor to the book.

The book has to have something about design, right? Who else but Robin Williams knows the secrets of design for non-designers? And we can’t forget the graphics side of things. Veerle would be perfect for that chapter. Oh, oh, oh! A chapter on accessibility. By Knowbility’s Sharron Rush, naturally. Sharron blogs at NetSquared now.

But wait. There’s more!

The book still needs chapters from Rachel Andrew, Shelley Powers (we really need more than one chapter on programming), Kelly Goto, and Molly Holzschlag. I couldn’t possibly leave out Molly, she’s written 25 or 30 web design books all by herself. And she worked on the Web Standards Project. Oh, that’s right, there are other female web design writers from the Web Standards Project, like Shirley Kaiser. Oh, my. Help me, I can’t stop. This is waaaayyyyy more than the ten chapters the men needed. Could we add additional quality information about topics the men overlooked? Or a prolog, an introduction, an epilog? Guest footnotes?

I know I’m missing someone really important, too. Who is it?

Cross posted at BlogHer.

Event: She’s Geeky (Un)Conference

Info from She’s Geeky:

A Women’s Tech (un)Conference
October 22-23 Computer History Museum, Mountain View, CA.
Cost: $125 until Sept 30 | $175 after.

The She’s Geeky (un)conference will provide an agenda-free and friendly environment for women who not only care about building technology that is useful for people, but who also want to encourage more women to get involved. It is designed to provide women who self-identify as geeky and who are engaged in various technology-focused disciplines with a gathering space in which they can exchange skills and discuss ideas and form community across and within disciplines.

Our goal is to create an open space forum for women in tech to come together to

  • Exchanging skills and learning from women from diverse fields of technology.
  • Discussing topics about women and technology.
  • Connecting the diverse range of women in technology, computing, entrepreneurship, funding, hardware, open source, nonprofit and any other technical geeky field.

This is an unconference so it will have an agenda created by the people who attend.

While we’re on the topic of women, I must point out the current issue of Wharton University’s Wharton @ Work, which features articles about women in technology. And I hope you’ve been keeping up with the O’Reilly Women in Technology series, where today Amy Hoy says that she doesn’t like articles about women in technology.

Technorati Tags: She’s Geeky

O’Reilly’s Women in Technology: Hear Us Roar

O’Reilly Network has a series called Women in Technology beginning now and continuing through September. The series creator, Tatiana Apandi, describes the purpose of the series:

My hope is that the myriad of experiences you read about here will showcase how valuable it is to hear from different women at all stages of their careers and lives. Whether you believe that there is gender inequality within the tech community that we should all work to improve or if you think that there are no issues at all, one underlying truth is that we should support each other as individuals.

I’ll give you a taste of what’s been said in the first three posts. I hope this will give you an incentive to subscribe to or follow the entire series for the month of September.

The first article in the series is Social Engineering by Leslie Hawthorne. She tends to look at her work in terms of tasks, rather than gender specific. Her comments included:

I’ve never thought of my role in the technical community as being the result of or in any way inextricably tied to my femininity. If anything, in an effort to be the change I wish to see in the world, I’ve distanced myself from questions of gender roles in my work. If we are all (to be) equal, it seems counter-intuitive to look at my work as informed by my being a woman. I do and I make, I listen and I advise, I lead and I follow, and none of these things are the exclusive purview of women. While others might, I would not argue that either sex has a particular aptitude for any of these things. Still, when I look at what I do and what I make, I far more often than not find women playing a similar role and doing similar tasks: building communities, creating space for creativity and connection to manifest, taking care of mundane and arcane details so that others can focus on executing to a grander vision.

Maria Klawe, in A Fifty Year Wave of Change, said

In many ways, this is the best time ever to be a female student in a technical area. Most of the leading high-tech companies are trying to increase the recruitment and retention of women, and they are doing it for business reasons. They value the diverse perspectives women bring to technical teams and have found that women tend to make excellent project managers because of their people and organizational skills. There are more female professors in science and engineering than ever before, though in some fields (such as biology and chemistry), the numbers are still significantly lower than one would expect given the increased numbers of women receiving Ph.D.s.

Is everything rosy for women in technology? Unfortunately, the answer is no. In the computer science (CS) field in which I’ve ended up working, participation by women has been steadily decreasing at the undergraduate level. Despite hard work by many people, we haven’t turned that around yet. Today, the percentage of CS bachelor’s degrees granted in research universities to women is at 14 percent, its lowest ever (see http://www.cra.org/info/taulbee/women.html). Many of the top departments are reporting female enrollments of fewer than 10 percent in their CS major programs. The situation at the doctoral level is a bit better, with between 15 and 18 percent of CS Ph.D.s going to women over the last seven years, and the percentage of women faculty in CS departments steadily increasing.

The oh, so fabulous Nelly Yusupova wrote an article called Be a Part of Influencing the Future. Nelly talks about the stereotypic geek vs. the reality of what geeks are and do. She mentioned the lack of geek role models for young women. She commented,

When I started my career, I was lucky to have had many positive role models. I entered the technology field in 1996, just as the Internet craze was hitting its stride and I landed a job at Webgrrls International. Their mission has been to get more women online. Our office was full of technically savvy women from whom I could learn; and learn I did. I am now the CTO of Webgrrls International and the Founder of DigitalWoman.com. Webgrrls International has an outreach program called Team Webgrrls. We go into the inner-city to get girls excited about technology and show them how fun it can be. One of these sessions showcased the different career possibilities in Technology. We had a “career fair” at the Mercy Center for Women and Girls in the Bronx and, as I was talking about my career path, being a geek, and how cool it was, one of the girls said to me “But you don’t wear thick glasses!” She now has a different perspective of what being a geek means. It is with pleasure that I am a geek. I love technology and I live it; and, hopefully, I can be that role model that other girls need so much.

We need to change the geek stereotype and start showcasing that geek girls are the hip and cool people in society. We are driving society, creating the tools for the musicians, artists, actors, humanitarians, scientists, and doctors. If more girls knew the broader picture of the technology applications, I believe they would be intrigued to be a part of it. I became an expert at computers and technology by not being intimidated by new information and not giving up just because I did not know something.

Technorati Tags: Women in Technology

WIT Women of the Year in Technology Awards

Women of the Year in Technology Awards were awarded by Women in Technology (WIT) last week.

Marie Mouchet, chief information officer for Southern Co. Generation, Southern Co. Nuclear and Southern Power, won in the “Enterprise Organizations” category. Terry Trout, vice president of customer experience for Cbeyond Inc., won in the “Medium/Mid-Market Organizations” category. In the “Small/Emerging Organization” category Nexidia Senior Vice President of marketing and product management Anna Convery was the winner.

According to a report in The San Antonio Business Journal, Marian Lucia of WIT said,

The winners show the impact women make is widespread and they are an inspiration to women in our community and girls who may aspire to follow in their footsteps.

The yearly awards are part of WIT’s effort to create a forum where women in technology can be recognized and promoted as role models. Congratulations to the Women of the Year in Technology.

Cross posted at BlogHer.

35 Designers x 5 Questions

It’s a long read but full of CSS tips, design ideas, font ideas, and recommended books. 35 Designers x 5 Questions | Smashing Magazine. These are the questions:

  • aspect of design you give the highest priority to
  • most useful CSS-technique you use very often
  • font you use in your projects very often
  • design-related book you highly recommend to read
  • design magazine you read on a daily/weekly basis (online or offline)

Of the 35 designers invited to participate, 2 were women. But who’s counting?

Web Sciences and Tim Berners-Lee

Tim Berners-Lee and three other pioneers began something at Web Science. Teachers need to follow these developments because they may result in a new curriculum or degree track called web sciences that unites all the diverse and uncoordinated threads we now have running that all lead to some sort of training in web technologies. They define web sciences like this:

When we discuss an agenda for a science of the Web, we use the term “science” in two ways. Physical and biological science analyzes the natural world, and tries to find microscopic laws that, extrapolated to the macroscopic realm, would generate the behavior observed. Computer science, by contrast, though partly analytic, is principally synthetic: It is concerned with the construction of new languages and algorithms in order to produce novel desired computer behaviors. Web science is a combination of these two features. The Web is an engineered space created through formally specified languages and protocols. However, because humans are the creators of Web pages and links between them, their interactions form emergent patterns in the Web at a macroscopic scale. These human interactions are, in turn, governed by social conventions and laws. Web science, therefore, must be inherently interdisciplinary; its goal is to both understand the growth of the Web and to create approaches that allow new powerful and more beneficial patterns to occur.

You might also be interested in Tim Berners-Lee’s testimony before Congress where he said, “The Web’s next most important application is likely being dreamed up somewhere by someone, quite likely a woman.”

Technorati Tags: ,