Category: WebStandards

Another big name adopts standards

The New York Times – Breaking News, World News & Multimedia has a new CSS layout with five, count ’em, five columns. It looks good and uses standards with menus constructed of lists and a layout built of divs. There’s a bit of JavaScript directing readers with really ancient browsers to some text-heavy pages for the headlines. Things aren’t perfect yet in terms of standards, but it’s deserving of praise as a step in the right direction.

Today’s big NY Times headline is that Katie Couric is leaving morning TV to become the first woman to lead an evening newscast on her own. I may start watching TV news again just to celebrate!

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

WaSP Annual Meeting

Jeffrey Zeldman gave some history to start off the first open WaSP annual meeting. Obviously, the early efforts of this group have made a big difference. As soon as IE7 is on board, every modern browser will support standards fairly well.

The Aussie from Stylemaster (John Allsop) encouraged everyone to remember that the first browser that supported CSS was IE3. Allsop said his only claim to fame is that he introduced Eric Meyer and Jeffrey Zeldman back when WaSP was trying to organize and find people to help promote their programs. WaSP worked because it effectively offered free consulting to the browser makers. They picked 10 things that really needed fixing and presented the list to Microsoft. Then they did Opera and later Netscape. They worked to be helpful rather than critical. This is a great model for a way to effect change. He said that the reason CSS works today is because of the early WaSP group of only 10 people.

Andy Clarke announced a new web site launch today for the WaSP site. Zeldman cut the virtual ribbon to launch it. The site was built by a group of designers working together. It uses WordPress.

Molly said that the new web site offers comments. Feedback has been important to growth and progress and like this first open meeting, the open comment function on the site brings a new era in the way things are done. In other words, they are inviting discussion and even more feedback.

The individual WaSP members introduced themselves. That was in process as I had to leave.

Photos at Flickr

SXSWi: WaSP Task Force: Getting the Job Done Right

This panel includes Molly Holzschlag, Drew McClellan, Matt May, Jennifer Taylor, Kimberly Blessing, Chris Wilson, and Dori Smith.

WaSP’s push for better standards support in browsers has been successful, so now they have moved on to more specialized topics. They have formed task forces to deal with these particular problems. For example, there is a DOM scripting task force, a Dreamweaver task force, and so on.

Molly described the Acid2 test, which was meant to test browsers or rendering agents for HTML, CSS, PNG, etc. This test was sponsored by Opera and written by Opera. This has evolved into a proposal for Acid3 as a rendering agent testing device. Acid3 will be a suite of tests developed collaboratively by a group of software makers, browser makers and others.

Dori talked about the DOM scripting task force. Enough browsers support JavaScript now that it’s time to generate best practices for JavaScript and to treat JavaScript as a real programming language. This task force is primarily, then, talking to client side scripters and trying to educate them about the best ways to implement standards and best practices. They are working toward unobtrusive scripting, which means accessible scripting, graceful degradation, usability is enhanced by the use of JavaScript, and behavior is separated from content in the same way that CSS separates content from presentation.

Jen talked about the Dreamweaver task force. Adobe now understands the importance of standards and accessibility because of this task force and has made decisions for the software tools that make it easier for users to create accessible web designs.

Kimberly discussed the education task force. The objects are to advocate teaching standards in programs that teach web development, IT, MIS, and CIS programs. The second objective is to create the use of standards in academic sites. YEEHAW! Go Kimberly! This task force focuses on outreach and a proliferation project. They also participate in higher ed events that support web development, such as HighEdWebDev. This task force will be putting a series of questionnaires on the WaSP web site to explore the options for progress in the education area.

Chris talked about the Microsoft task force. He wants to help WaSP be successful in guiding Microsoft and has worked on standards within Microsoft since 1995.

Photos at Flickr

Should industry expertise count as a qualification for college instructors?

I was chatting in the hallways with Stephanie Sullivan at SXSW. She is a premier Dreamweaver expert, active at Community MX, an author, and an excellent web designer. But, and here’s the ‘but’ that matters to college HR departments, she doesn’t have a degree. Therefore, the most knowledgeable person in her whole geographic area (Stephanie herself) in the subject of Dreamweaver is not allowed to teach Dreamweaver at her local college.

This trend to exclude real world experience and industry expertise is not limited to the state where Stephanie lives. I’ve seen it elsewhere, too. Perhaps that explains why college course work doesn’t seem to be able to keep pace with the latest knowledge and what industry considers best practices in web design.

I suggest that in a fast changing field like web design where technology changes are rapid and constant, using people with real world/industry expertise is a good idea. Heaven knows that full-time college faculty have very little time to spend on keeping up with technological change. Maybe the need to accept industry experience isn’t true of disciplines like history or math, but in terms of web design, it seems like an important idea to embrace.

SXSWi: Web Standards and SEO

Aaron Gustafson, Eric Meyer, and Ed Shull are the panelists for this one. They began by talking about the people who try to cheat their way to good search engine ranking. The search engines usually catch up with this sooner or later and the sites get banned from rankings. Using standards and ethical methods usually work well for SEO.

I’m in the back of the room (need the electricity) and I cannot tell who is talking, so I’m just going to quote in general most of the time.

Ed said to be sure to use a good title. They all stressed writing good copy and making the page valuable enough so that people would want to link to it. Adhering to accessibility guidelines for descriptive anchor tag text and not using ‘click here’ is also a good practice. Regarding title attributes for links as opposed to alt text, make sure that the alt text is useful. Eric did say that when he uses title attributes, he often makes it a joke or something sarcastic, but that he makes sure the alt text is descriptive.

They discussed the h1 element and how it should be used. Many try to make the h1 element match the page title. The h1 should reflect the content of the page.

Sometime the search engines have marginalized the fine points. So for an issue like the hierarchy of heading elements, they suggested using your best judgement.

Following accessibilty guidelines unlocks content and makes it available to the search engines. Good page titles, good navigation, and good anchor text are the lowest hanging accessibility fruit to be grabbing first.

Do sitemaps help? Yes, they provide links to every page for the search engines, and they provide another opportunity for good anchor text.

Can microformats help with SEO? They have potential as a way of adding semantic value that enable particular kinds of searches. As soon as one of the big search engines embrace microformats, then a search something like looking for only the resumes of people who are friends of Jeffrey Zeldman becomes a possibility. This sounds like what Liz Henry was talking about in our butt kicking panel, in looking for a way to identify female bloggers: maybe the answer is microformats.

How can we spread the word that using standards will help SEO? One guy suggested sky writers! More seriously, doing things the right way has a payoff and benefit in terms of search engine rankings so it is a self-enhancing practice.

More help for beginners

Ian Lloyd over at Latest Accessibility News on Accessify | One of the (Many) Reasons I Have Been Quiet, part 3 announced that he is writing a book for sitepoint that will be aimed at beginners. This expands the field of writing specifically for beginners by about 33% according to my informal count.

What is that count? There’s my own book, Integrated HTML and CSS: A Smarter, Faster Way to Learn, there’s the Head First book I reviewed here called Head First HTML with CSS and XHTML, and now Ian’s coming soon volume, Build Your First Website The Right Way Using HTML & CSS.

I know a lot of writers are very competitive about the success of their books vs. the success of other books on the same topic, but I am not afflicted with that competitive gene. I tend to look at it as a step in the right direction that more books are being released into the great cosmos that advocate the principles that I believe are the right ones for education and learning in this field. If it happens often enough, changes are bound to occur in the places where curriculum is determined, and that definitely needs to happen.

I probably lied before. I am as competitive as the next person. It would be wonderful to be rich and famous because of something I wrote. But that isn’t what it’s about for me. It isn’t about money or fame. It’s about changing an educational system that doesn’t serve students in the way it should. It’s about improving the quality of what is offered to web design students. Every new book that moves things in the right direction is a welcome addition to my world.

Professional vs. Unprofessional web development practices

Le blog personnel de Joe Clark: Failed Redesigns Joe Clark tears into some sites who fail to redesign with the latest standards in mind. Instead they still contain tag soup, tables, or other design factors he labels unprofessional. He says the designers should have known better.

The question becomes, for me, Are we teaching students to know better? If your students leave your classroom thinking tables-based layouts and tag soup are the way to do things, then have you failed as a teacher? Have you turned people loose in the workplace who are less than professional? I think the answer is yes.

We need to work toward ensuring that college teachers meet professional standards so that students will reach the same levels of professionalism.